Wharton Study Finds Humans Are Surrendering Their Judgment to AI — and Getting Worse Outcomes
New research from Wharton documents 'cognitive surrender': when humans review AI-generated work, they accept wrong answers with higher confidence than they would without AI assistance at all.
A new study from Wharton's AI research group has identified what it calls "cognitive surrender" — the tendency for humans to defer to AI-generated outputs even when those outputs are incorrect, and to do so with greater confidence than they'd have working alone. As @rohanpaul_ai reported, the findings suggest the widely adopted "AI writes, humans review" model is fundamentally broken.
Unlock the full briefing
Get every story in today's briefing, the full archive, and the daily AI intelligence brief.
All stories today
Full archive
Daily brief
Cancel anytime. Payments powered by Stripe.