AI Hallucinations in Court Get a Meta Twist: A Viral Post About Fake Citations Was Itself Full of Fake Citations
A widely shared thread about a lawyer sanctioned for citing ChatGPT-generated fake cases turned out to contain its own AI-hallucinated details — a perfect illustration of how hard it is to verify AI outputs at scale.
A post by @rryssf_ went viral today recounting the now-familiar story of a lawyer sanctioned for citing six fabricated cases generated by ChatGPT in court filings. The thread noted that courts now require "AI disclosure" but not "AI verification" — a pointed critique of a policy gap. The post was shared tens of thousands of times.
Unlock the full briefing
Get every story in today's briefing, the full archive, and the daily AI intelligence brief.
All stories today
Full archive
Daily brief
Cancel anytime. Payments powered by Stripe.